Sapling
Triple Ace
Registration Date: 05-28-2011
Posts: 168
Location: Latvia
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: BoS - SAN
 |
|
|
10-27-2012 08:24 |
|
|
Sapling
Triple Ace
Registration Date: 05-28-2011
Posts: 168
Location: Latvia
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: BoS - SAN
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Firetrap
How is it complicated at all? It's just like another deputy but without the remove member or edit clan page options, the code is pretty much already there |
It's too complicated.
|
|
|
10-27-2012 08:41 |
|
|
Mortis
Emperor
Registration Date: 05-01-2007
Posts: 1,159
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: BoS exLead
|
|
It's not complicated guys, get real. I would love to see this implemented. I think I asked for it long time ago. It was the idea of having more roles in clan which leader would be able to appoint in same way as deputy.
Thumb up from me.
__________________
"The brightest light is invisible. It shines through your deeds. And warms the universe."
"Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind."
|
|
|
10-27-2012 10:00 |
|
|
darc
Viking
Registration Date: 01-17-2008
Posts: 691
Race in game: Absorber
|
|
great idea thumbs yup from me
|
|
|
10-27-2012 11:12 |
|
|
Fischkopf
Member
Registration Date: 06-08-2012
Posts: 39
|
|
sounds good to me 
|
|
|
10-27-2012 11:13 |
|
|
acidic
Junior Member
Registration Date: 07-19-2012
Posts: 12
Race in game: Cultist
Clan: LGN Leader
|
|
yea its a good idea, and things could extend on from this, to see a clan of say 50 players, where only 2 guys have any form of control is a bad idea
having someone able to deal with the armoury is a great idea
having someone able to maybe even accept players into the clan other than the leader or dep, so like 'recruitment official' or something like that could also be possible
anyways, im sidetracking, back on point, its a great idea, id love to see something like that implemented
|
|
|
10-28-2012 00:39 |
|
|
Demandred
Triple Ace
Registration Date: 02-19-2008
Posts: 165
Location: Ireland
Race in game: Cursed One
Clan: [BoS]
|
|
definitely a good idea, thumbs up from me too
__________________
In-game name: Speed-Legend
|
|
|
11-04-2012 23:19 |
|
|
Izuall
Member
Registration Date: 08-26-2012
Posts: 29
Location: Poland
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: DB
|
|
That's why deputy should be chosen wisely. It ought to be someone who's most active in the clan.
__________________
IGN: Izuall
This post has been edited 18905 time(s), it was last edited by Izuall: Today, 9:43.
|
|
|
11-11-2012 17:58 |
|
|
Cheese!!!!!!!!! :D
Double Ace
Registration Date: 12-07-2009
Posts: 112
Race in game: Beastmaster
|
|
I think it's a pretty good idea, tis annoying when you need to start an expo or apply to someone's and you have to wait a couple of hours or just go without a decent amount of arcana.. It'd be handy to have someone who can remove CA gear from people who are offline with it.
Also - "This post has been edited 18905 time(s), it was last edited by Izuall: Today, 9:43." lolwut O.o
__________________
I'M A PIGGY, I LOOOOOVE MUD!
|
|
|
11-11-2012 19:52 |
|
|
Varla
Newbie
Registration Date: 11-09-2012
Posts: 1
Race in game: Cursed One
Clan: BOS
|
|
Great idea especially as im active 18/7 and i always see people offline with sham gear or questing without word to anyone definate yes from me.
__________________
IGN UW - penguin_dude
IGN NECRO - bogul
|
|
|
11-12-2012 06:36 |
|
|
TheKid
Double Ace
Registration Date: 12-19-2010
Posts: 139
Race in game: Absorber
|
|
Sounds Good To Me
__________________
MrSnowman
|
|
|
11-12-2012 12:47 |
|
|
Izuall
Member
Registration Date: 08-26-2012
Posts: 29
Location: Poland
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: DB
|
|
| quote: |
| Also - "This post has been edited 18905 time(s), it was last edited by Izuall: Today, 9:43." lolwut O.o |
Hacks.
As it comes to the topic, you talked me into it. I'm for it.
__________________
IGN: Izuall
This post has been edited 18905 time(s), it was last edited by Izuall: Today, 9:43.
|
|
|
11-12-2012 20:30 |
|
|
Pops
moderator...apparently
Registration Date: 10-22-2008
Posts: 652
Location: england
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: BoS
|
|
like this idea.
thumbs up from me.
__________________
No, you didn't imagine it, I DID just go there 
|
|
|
11-30-2012 17:16 |
|
|
CrazyXxShanexX
Member
Registration Date: 12-03-2012
Posts: 44
Location: Chester
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: A.S
|
|
This seems like a brill idea thumbs up from me too
because in A.S items that are way too high for most members in the clan are not needed plus if members that have items in the CA are not online and need to be taken out but Leader/dep isent on then it would be easyier to get more items which are needed into the CA if this was implemented 
__________________
Real Name - Shane Leon
Ingame Name - Crazyshane152 - Underworld
|
|
|
12-03-2012 11:29 |
|
|
steco
Full Member
Registration Date: 05-09-2012
Posts: 56
|
|
deputy can be passed over to other responsible person who will be online. so imo no need for that
__________________
R2 ID: 17968
WENDIGO SLAYER with badge!
|
|
|
12-03-2012 16:11 |
|
|
CrazyXxShanexX
Member
Registration Date: 12-03-2012
Posts: 44
Location: Chester
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: A.S
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by steco
deputy can be passed over to other responsible person who will be online. so imo no need for that |
there not gonna keep passing over deputy every time the deputy logs of tho are they what firetrap means (i think) is to stop hassle with changing dep every time they go off it would be much easier to just have someone who can lead the CA if both leader and deputy are offline im i right there fire (im not sure if thats what you mean)
__________________
Real Name - Shane Leon
Ingame Name - Crazyshane152 - Underworld
|
|
|
12-04-2012 18:29 |
|
|
CrazyXxShanexX
Member
Registration Date: 12-03-2012
Posts: 44
Location: Chester
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: A.S
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Firetrap
Not just one person but multiple |
Yeah thats what i mean just dident write it right
__________________
Real Name - Shane Leon
Ingame Name - Crazyshane152 - Underworld
|
|
|
12-05-2012 00:58 |
|
|
LucifersAngel
Lord
Registration Date: 04-19-2009
Posts: 430
Location: Cornwall, UK
Race in game: Absorber
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Firetrap
No, my idea was people who are Armourers are to be able to remove from ca also and I don't want restrictions on the amount of people, it's the whole idea of having a responsible roll, you choose them carefully but if you trust your whole clan you could if wanted make them all Armourers |
It's a nice idea but I don't see that happening. Devs wouldn't see the point in making everyone responsible for CA because there'd be too much in-clan fighting probably. "Why did you take it off me, I was on a caravan?" - "It wasn't me it was x." - "I didn't do it, why are you blaming me?" - "Why is the elastic set not in anymore? I'm in a rush to apply for an expo that's about to end phase 1?" - "I needed room to put my cruel clubs in for someone to do their strength pilgrimage?" etc.
Obviously all hypothetical, but all likely in the event there is a whole clan of people capable of affecting the entire clan's CA. Having an additional one or two would mean it's more likely someone's online to deal with important items being taken offline, so people don't have to wait hours.
__________________
Martyrdom against Fascism
Fascist Instituation of Control
Recognition - Rejection - Resentment
Para todos todo, para nosotros nada
For everyone everything, for us nothing
EZLN
|
|
|
12-05-2012 07:46 |
|
|
LucifersAngel
Lord
Registration Date: 04-19-2009
Posts: 430
Location: Cornwall, UK
Race in game: Absorber
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by CrazyXxShanexX
| quote: |
Originally posted by LucifersAngel
| quote: |
Originally posted by Firetrap
No, my idea was people who are Armourers are to be able to remove from ca also and I don't want restrictions on the amount of people, it's the whole idea of having a responsible roll, you choose them carefully but if you trust your whole clan you could if wanted make them all Armourers |
It's a nice idea but I don't see that happening. Devs wouldn't see the point in making everyone responsible for CA because there'd be too much in-clan fighting probably. "Why did you take it off me, I was on a caravan?" - "It wasn't me it was x." - "I didn't do it, why are you blaming me?" - "Why is the elastic set not in anymore? I'm in a rush to apply for an expo that's about to end phase 1?" - "I needed room to put my cruel clubs in for someone to do their strength pilgrimage?" etc.
Obviously all hypothetical, but all likely in the event there is a whole clan of people capable of affecting the entire clan's CA. Having an additional one or two would mean it's more likely someone's online to deal with important items being taken offline, so people don't have to wait hours. |
he wants no restrictions but the leader or dep has to pick the most responsible people to become armourers
which would work |
Yeah I understand that, but I don't see the devs allowing it to happen completely unrestricted. As the answer to the problem of people going offline with needed items, you'd only need a couple more to take items off people. With this it might as well be the necro server where you just lend each other the items you need.
__________________
Martyrdom against Fascism
Fascist Instituation of Control
Recognition - Rejection - Resentment
Para todos todo, para nosotros nada
For everyone everything, for us nothing
EZLN
|
|
|
12-05-2012 15:33 |
|
|
CrazyXxShanexX
Member
Registration Date: 12-03-2012
Posts: 44
Location: Chester
Race in game: Absorber
Clan: A.S
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by LucifersAngel
| quote: |
Originally posted by CrazyXxShanexX
| quote: |
Originally posted by LucifersAngel
| quote: |
Originally posted by Firetrap
No, my idea was people who are Armourers are to be able to remove from ca also and I don't want restrictions on the amount of people, it's the whole idea of having a responsible roll, you choose them carefully but if you trust your whole clan you could if wanted make them all Armourers |
It's a nice idea but I don't see that happening. Devs wouldn't see the point in making everyone responsible for CA because there'd be too much in-clan fighting probably. "Why did you take it off me, I was on a caravan?" - "It wasn't me it was x." - "I didn't do it, why are you blaming me?" - "Why is the elastic set not in anymore? I'm in a rush to apply for an expo that's about to end phase 1?" - "I needed room to put my cruel clubs in for someone to do their strength pilgrimage?" etc.
Obviously all hypothetical, but all likely in the event there is a whole clan of people capable of affecting the entire clan's CA. Having an additional one or two would mean it's more likely someone's online to deal with important items being taken offline, so people don't have to wait hours. |
he wants no restrictions but the leader or dep has to pick the most responsible people to become armourers
which would work |
Yeah I understand that, but I don't see the devs allowing it to happen completely unrestricted. As the answer to the problem of people going offline with needed items, you'd only need a couple more to take items off people. With this it might as well be the necro server where you just lend each other the items you need. |
fair does well maybe not one person but 3-5 people can have the responsibly of being the armourers and i do see where your coming from
__________________
Real Name - Shane Leon
Ingame Name - Crazyshane152 - Underworld
|
|
|
12-05-2012 17:02 |
|
|
|
